Timeframe, timeline, and tempo

A contract can be executed within minutes, or over days, months and years. It depends on the type of service and often on the level of commitment involved. Some service contracts are worth hundreds of millions of dollars, stretching over many years. Many contracts are customized, negotiated and specified between two or parties, as is the case with professional services and outsourcing. Others may last for a few seconds, involve small amounts of money, and the contract itself might be implicit or automatic.

Purchasing a ticket for a train ride includes implicit agreement on what the service will provide and at what cost. The ticket is the contract. Airline tickets are attached with conditions of carriage in fine print that rarely anyone reads, but it is all there, including a force majeure clause. Citizens and taxpayers sign up for many pure public services simply by virtue of identifying with a community, municipality, province or country. As a taxpayer, you don’t have to sign up to make use of the president, Parliament, or police, and yet they are services that operate on very large budgets.

Dialog and interaction happen within the timeframe of the service contract, commencing with engagement and concluding with fulfillment. The various elements of dialog and interaction may occur according to a timeline, scripted or unscripted. They may happen in series and in parallel, or even within a single transaction, especially when they are automatic or implicit, and involve machines and software. The engagement can be spontaneous or scheduled ahead of time; it can occur at specific intervals, periodic cycles, or as and when the need emerges. The nature of the service defines the clock speed or tempo. Each cycle may be instant, last for minutes, hours, days, or stretch over longer periods of time.

Regardless of how fast or how often, for capacity to properly interact with demand, the dialog and interaction between users and agents are critical. Users and agents conduct dialog and interaction through touch points and interfaces. Given the extraordinary expanse of the universe of services, touch points and interfaces exist in all kinds of forms, sizes, and shapes. Touchpoints and interfaces ensure alignment and fit. Alignment avoids unnecessary seek and search costs on both sides. Fit ensures solid and secure connections with a very low rate of error.

“A line is a dot that went for a walk” – Paul Klee

Filed under: thoughts


TL;DR I can audit the design of a service to prevent or predict systemic failure, using a proprietary method called 16F I make intractable problems, tractable by reframing them. I then design solutions that won't create problems elsewhere, now or in the future. The solutions are in the form of services. I focus on system-level structures that give meaning and purpose to the design of lower-level constructs such as processes, interfaces, and interactions. I've spent the last 10 years obsessed with the questions: What are services? Why do they fail? Why do they exist? I'm now writing a book. Design is my dogma. Curiosity is my doctrine. Industrial engineering is my discipline. @mxiqbal

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s